Study: Happiness plummets with the arrival of kids.

Those who have been reading my articles for awhile probably read an older article of mine titled "Children are Overrated." I always speak facts regardless of who they offend and it is a fact that a large percentage of today's brats do NOT bring happiness into the parent's lives. Now a scientific study confirms that today's kids are more of an annoyance than a source of happiness. Why? It's simple; we have an entire generation of kids that were raised under the rules of a feminarchy.

How about 8 things he hates about you?

I hate that Rachael Lucas is a conservative. Logic and common-sense should be apolitical. Unfortunately, men's rights seem to be 'championed' (say, less ridiculed) by the right, which help solidify MRAs reputation as angry white men. We need to hear a lot more sense from the left.
Nonetheless, for the MRAs, this is a good read.

http://rachellucas.com/index.php/2008/05/08/how-about-8-things-he-hates-...

Dr. Helen links to this Men’s Health magazine article with grim detestation, and I can see why. It’s called “8 Things She Hates About You — Don’t know why she’s angry? Now you do…”

Yahoo!: American "Men" are in a recession while American "Women" are not.

An article on Yahoo! states "From last November through this April, American women aged 20 and up gained nearly 300,000 jobs, according to the household survey of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). At the same time, American men lost nearly 700,000 jobs. You might even say American men are in recession, and American women are not."

Michael Moore: "Men have made a mess of our world.. women deserve none of the blame"

It appears filmmaker Michael Moore agrees with the feminists and Marc Rudov's highly inaccurate position(s).

According to the three stooges: Yes, the evil, mythical patriarchy is to blame. It is men that are evil! Bad, bad men! Down with them! Pussies!

Sound juvenile? Well it should because the entire premise that "men alone" are to blame (for all of the world's ills and women's negative behavior) is so fucking stupid -- and downright wrong -- that it makes Paris Hilton's statements seem intelligient.

Gary D. Nadler's The Curse of 1920

An excerpt from the website: "The Curse of 1920 radically changed what had been practiced for 2,000 years of established history wherein women covered their heads.
Why now the change? Because it is just one more way where women have sought to erase the divinely ordained line of distinction between men and women."

Read more on "The Curse of 1920."

Is Marc Rudov using Men's Rights issues to make money?

Marc Rudov claims to be a real MRA, but he is constantly bashing men while excusing women in his latest messages. It seems at times as if Marc champions women at the expense of those he is claiming to help; men. You can literally compare what feminists say with what Marc says. For instance the feminists believe men are in power and obviously so does Marc Rudov. He also plugs every transmission he makes with an advertisement for his books. It is my opinion that the reason behind this is that women "purchase more" than men do.

Rudov's Latest Debate: Hilarious!

Another no holds barred debate from Marc Rudov, The No Nonsense Man. I'll get on him when he does something wrong, but when he does something right I'll acknowledge that too. Great debate Marc! I especially like how when Lis says "I am personally offended" he says "I don't care."

Classic!

Plaintiffs sought for Class Action vs. VAWA

Subject: Plaintiffs for Class Action VAWA

"Hello,

I'm expanding my search for additional named-plaintiffs for the VAWA class action suit. The requirements are

1. Male and a U.S. citizen.

2. You married an alien wife.

3. You sponsored her for a temporary green card which she got.

4. You did not sponsor your wife or ex-wife for a permanent green card.

5. You believe or know that your wife or ex-wife used or is using or will use the VAWA self petitioning procedures that accuse you of abuse in order for her to obtain a permanent green card.

Angry Harry: Is the training of women doctors a waste of money?

An excerpt from the article: "60% of women doctors will give up their 'careers' within about 10 years.

The continuing deterioration of the National Health Service despite the enormous extra sums of money being put into it by the taxpayer is largely thanks to the training of more and more women to become doctors in the place of men.

In areas such as medicine, the requirement to give women 'equal opportunities' by demanding that medical schools try to train as many women as they do men to become doctors is leading to far worse conditions and shortfalls in the NHS - a service that is already failing the country abysmally.

Another bogus BBC claim: Women have higher rates of self-harm than men.

Women as victims and/or innocents seems to be the name of the game today. We even have a so-called MRA starting to sound like a feminist(Hint: He's on Cavuto every week) and of course we have the ever increasing onslaught of feminist victim politics being forced upon us by popular media.

Their latest comedy routine is to claim "Women have higher rates of self-harm than men." That rates right up there with "women 'attempt' suicide more than men." While women are getting funding and all kinds of attention for "attempting" suicide, men actually "commit" suicide and are largely ignored by this woman-worshipping society. They only tend to worry about men when the women and children need someone to protect and serve them.

Syndicate content